Rooyesh

Iran’s Jews have given the country a loyalty pledge in the face of cash offers aimed at encouraging them to move to Israel, the arch-enemy of its Islamic rulers. The incentives - ranging from £5,000 a person to £30,000 for families - were offered from a special fund established by wealthy expatriate Jews in an effort to prompt a mass migration to Israel among Iran’s 25,000-strong Jewish community. The offers were made with Israel’s official blessing and were additional to the usual state packages it provides to Jews emigrating from the diaspora. However, the Society of Iranian Jews dismissed them as “immature political enticements” and said their national identity was not for sale. “The identity of Iranian Jews is not tradable for any amount of money,” the society said in a statement. “Iranian Jews are among the most ancient Iranians.

Iran’s Jews love their Iranian identity and their culture, so threats and this immature political enticement will not achieve their aim of wiping out the identity of Iranian Jews.” The Israeli newspaper Ma’ariv reported that the incentives had been doubled after offers of £2,500 a head failed to attract any Iranian Jews to leave for Israel. Iran’s sole Jewish MP, Morris Motamed, said the offers were insulting and put the country’s Jews under pressure to prove their loyalty. “It suggests the Iranian Jew can be encouraged to emigrate by money,” he said. “Iran’s Jews have always been free to emigrate and three-quarters of them did so after the revolution but 70% of those went to America, not Israel.” Iran’s Jewish population has dwindled from about 80,000 at the time of the 1979 Islamic revolution but remains the largest of any country in the Middle East apart from Israel. Jews have lived in Iran since at least 700BC. Hostility between Iran’s government and Israel means Iranian Jews are often subject to official mistrust and scrutiny. Source: The Guardian

Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has received a group of 50 economists who criticised his economic policies for fuelling inflation and hurting the poor, media reports said Friday. Eight ministers, the central bank governor and several of Ahmadinejad’s senior advisers took part in the discussions, which lasted six hours on Thursday evening, according to Iranian media outlets.

After listening to criticism from the economists, the Iranian president asked them to present their solutions “to sort out the economic problems of the country.” He proposed that they consider the best way in which to inject “oil income into the economy” of the Islamic republic. “Insofar as the oil incomes increased and while we can predict the price of oil will continue to increase, adequate methods should be found to inject these oil revenues into the economy,” said Ahmadinejad. The rising price of oil on international markets has contributed significantly to the coffers of Iran, which is the fourth largest producer of oil in the world. Ahmadinejad’s meeting with the economists comes a month after 57 local economists wrote the Iranian leader an open letter in which they warned him of his economic policies. “The monetary and banking policies adopted by the government go against their stated objective of creating justice” in society, read the text of the letter. Its most prominent signatories included Mohammad Satari-Far, a former chief of Iran’s planning and budget organisation, and an ex-chief of the Iranian stock exchange, Hossein Abdeh Tabrizi. The Tehran government has been the target of criticism in recent weeks over a surprise interest rate cut which economists said risked overheating the economy. Ahmadinejad has been repeatedly criticised by the press for stoking already high inflation in the country with high spending and promising lavish local investment projects on provincial tours.

Source: AFP

.N. nuclear inspectors banned earlier this year by Iran from visiting a heavy water reactor will now be allowed to inspect it before the end of July, the International Atomic Energy Agency said Friday. In a further sign of compromise, the IAEA said the country also agreed to answer questions on past experiments that the international community fears could be linked to a weapons program.

The IAEA — the U.N.’s nuclear monitor — said Iran promised the concessions, including the inspection of the Arak reactor, in a meeting this week between its officials and a senior delegation from the Vienna-based agency. Any Iranian decision to cooperate with the agency could weaken a push by the United States and Western allies on the council to impose new U.N. sanctions — even if Iran continues to defy the council’s main demand that it freeze uranium enrichment. IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei said Monday that Iran has scaled back its uranium enrichment program, suggesting a new willingness from the government to resolve the international deadlock. Years of Iranian stonewalling have left the IAEA unable to ascertain the truth of the country’s claims that it has no nuclear weapons ambitions and that its atomic activities are meant strictly to generate power. Its refusal to cooperate was the trigger that prompted U.N. Security Council involvement last year and led to two sets of sanctions. In talks between Iranian officials and IAEA Deputy Director General Olli Heinonen, “agreement was reached on … a visit of agency inspectors to the heavy water research reactor at Arak by the end of July,” said am IEAE statement. The two sides also agreed on how “to resolve remaining issues regarding Iran’s past plutonium experiments,” appointing new inspectors in the place of those banned by Iran earlier this year, finalizing ways of fuller IAEA supervision of uranium enrichment activities. Remaining issues include “uranium contamination found on equipment at a specific location,” said the agency, alluding to traces of enriched uranium at a military site — which could indicate links to a weapons program_ as “well as studies related to specified projects,” again shorthand for nuclear work that could have military applications. Key in any IAEA overview of Iran’s nuclear activities is access to the Arak heavy water research reactor, because it will produce plutonium once completed sometime in the next decade. Because plutonium and enriched uranium can be used as the fissile core of warheads, the Security Council demanded a stop not only to enrichment but also to construction at the Arak project. Also sought was full openness on more than two decades of nuclear activities that went undetected only until revealed by an Iranian dissident group four years ago. Iran has refused both the demands on enrichment and stopping construction of Arak. A decision to lift its ban an allowing inspectors to tour the site would signal its readiness to again put a key component of its nuclear program under international purview after months of keeping it off limits. At Natanz, site of Iran’s enrichment program, IAEA inspectors have been allowed fairly broad access to approximately 2,000 centrifuges set up to spin uranium gas into enriched material. But the IAEA statement suggested Tehran was ready for more concessions there as well, saying a new meeting was planned in early August on “the finalization of the safeguards approach” at the facility. Questions about plutonium experiments go back to the discovery by agency inspectors of secret experiments in the mid-1990s and their findings that not all plutonium Iran said it had possessed is accounted for. Part of Iran’s offer appeared to open the door for IAEA inspectors to look for fresh samples of enriched uranium at a site where earlier finds revealed traces that could have come from an undeclared program linked to the military. And the Iranian pledge to be more open on “studies related to specific projects” appeared to allude to IAEA questions about the so-called “Green Salt Project.” Diplomats told the AP last year that the agency was acting on U.S. intelligence linking experiments connected to uranium enrichment with high explosives and warhead design — information previously dismissed by Iran as “based on false and fabricated documents.” Source: The Associated Press