Tuesday, August 28, 2007

U.S. troops reportedly detain Iranians

American troops raided a Baghdad hotel Tuesday night and took away a group of about 10 people that a U.S.-funded radio station said included six members of an Iranian delegation here to negotiate contracts with Iraq’s government. The Iranian Embassy did not confirm the report.

But it said seven Iranians — an embassy employee and six members of a delegation from Iran’s Electricity Ministry — were staying at the Sheraton Ishtar Hotel, which was the one raided by U.S. soldiers. An arrest of Iranian officials would add to tensions between Washington and Tehran already strained by the detention of each other’s citizens as well as U.S. accusations of Iranian involvement in Iraq’s violence and alleged Iranian efforts to develop nuclear bombs. Videotape shot Tuesday night by Associated Press Television News showed U.S. troops leading about 10 blindfolded and handcuffed men out of the hotel in central Baghdad.

Other soldiers carried out what appeared to be luggage and at least one briefcase and a laptop computer bag. A U.S. military spokesman, Lt. Col. Christopher Garver, declined to comment, saying the action was part of an operation that had not been completed. The Internet site of Radio Sawa, an Arabic language station financed by the United States, said Iranian officials were detained and taken to an unknown location. It said the Iranian delegation was in Baghdad to negotiate contracts on electric power stations. An Iranian diplomat told The Associated Press that the Iranian Embassy had notified Iraqi authorities about the Radio Sawa report. The diplomat refused to give his name.

Iran has constantly complained about the U.S. detention since Jan. 11 of five Iranians who were in the northern Iraqi city of Irbil. U.S. officials say the five include the operations chief and other members of Iran’s elite Quds Force, which is accused of arming and training Iraqi militants. The Iranian regime denies any involvement in the violence wracking its neighbor. U.S. authorities are unhappy about Iran’s arrest of four people with dual American-Iranian citizenship for allegedly seeking to undermine the Islamic republic’s security. Two are imprisoned in Iran, while two are free but barred from leaving the country. Relations also are edgy over the suspicions of the U.S. and its allies that Tehran is using its civilian nuclear power program as a screen to develop atomic weapons.

Iran denies that, saying the program only has the peaceful aim of generating electricity. The strains have many people in the region worried about the possibility of fighting between the U.S. and Iran. But while making his latest defense of Iran’s nuclear program earlier Tuesday, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad dismissed the possibility of any U.S. military action against Iran, saying Washington has no plan and is not in a position to take such action.

Source: The Associated Press

Posted by Editors at 23:24:51 | Permalink | Comments (1) »

Lawyer Rejects Charges Against Radio Farda Journalist

The lawyer for RFE/RL journalist Parnaz Azima, who has been prevented from leaving Iran since January, says she is now facing a charge of acting against national security. Mohammad Hossein Aqasi says no date has been set for a trial  Azima already faces charges of spreading propaganda against the Iranian state and has had to post bail in Tehran equivalent to some $550,000.

She is one of four Iranian Americans who are either detained or being kept from leaving Iran. Aqasi spoke to Radio Farda’s Mosaddegh Katouzian.

RFE/RL: Previously Azima was accused of propaganda against the regime, what is her official charge right now?

Mohammad Hossein Aqasi: In the early stages, the prosecutor had indicated her charge was engaging in propaganda against the Islamic Republic through her activities as a Radio Farda journalist. However, the court has now charged Ms. Azima for activities against national security through working for Radio Farda and publishing articles against the regime. There is also another charge which was in the earlier file but was suspended. This charge relates to having equipment for receiving satellite signals. So, the charge is changed, although they are still referring to the Article 500 of the Islamic punitive law, which is about propaganda against the system.

RFE/RL: Are there examples of such activities of working against national security in the file?

Aqasi: There are printouts of Ms. Azima’s programs that were broadcast after 2005. These reports were simply aired by Ms. Azima and were not commented upon by her. Therefore, her activities do not amount to propaganda against the regime.

RFE/RL:  What is the equipment that the prosecutor refers to?

Aqasi: When the law enforcement officers went to Ms. Azima’s home for the first time in 2005, they confiscated a receiver and satellite dish.

RFE/RL: Is Ms. Azima accused of having brought this equipment from abroad?

Aqasi: No. This equipment belongs to her mother. Satellite dishes and receivers are widely distributed and used in Iran and many people own one. However, this is against the law and is normally punished with a fine of 100,000 to 300,000 toomans [$120 to 360].

RFE/RL: Do you think that Azima will receive her passport now?

Aqasi: The order for banning her from leaving the country was issued on Esfand 25 [March 15]. Such orders are valid only for a maximum of six months, although they can be extended. Therefore, the ban must be removed by 25 of Shahrivar [September 17]. However, it seems like they don’t want to return her passport to her. Because the case is in its early stages, and because of the nature of the case, I can not reveal all the information I have, but I can tell you that there is a decision that Ms. Azima stays in Iran until her trial.

RFE/RL: Is there any indication in the file about when Azima may receive her passport again?

Aqasi: There is no time frame indicated in the file. Those officials who decide about this case, other than the judiciary, emphasize that Ms. Azima must remain in Iran for now and indicate issues related to foreign relationships are the reason, which refers to the relationship between Iran and the United States. 

RFE/RL: Which institution do these authorities which you refer to as nonjudiciary officials represent?

Aqasi: Please let us not get into the details, but in general you know what type of official may have a say about national security cases. They are generally the authority that decides about the case and the court usually follows their direction.

RFE/RL: If these charges are proven in court, what kind of punishment is prescribed by law?

Aqasi: According to the Article 500 of the punitive law, the punishment for such charges are between three months to a year. For the satellite dishes there is normally a 100,000-tooman fine. So, compared to these numbers, the bail set on Ms. Azima is extremely high, an indication that they want to keep her in Iran for now.

RFE/RL: What is the next step and how will the case proceed?

Aqasi: We will certainly push for a speedy pursuit of this case. My impression is that the case of these four people is a political case related to the Iran-U.S. relationship. There are no real charges and if the relationship between Iran and the United States were different, they would not be kept in Iran in the first place.

Posted by Editors at 15:38:42 | Permalink | Comments (1) »

Iran to allow motorists extra petrol

Iran’s government announced on Tuesday it was allowing motorists to take extra petrol from pumps over the summer holiday period, two months after imposing a strict rationing plan aimed at slashing consumption. Drivers of private cars will be allowed to take an extra 100 litres (22 gallons) from the pumps, on top of the 100 litres of petrol they are now limited to each month.

The 100 litres of additional petrol appears to be is a one-off gesture by the government to help people travel through the summer holiday period and will not be repeated in subsequent months. It is not clear if the decision met with the wholehearted approval of the oil ministry, whose caretaker minister said just days earlier that it was not possible to give an additional quota for holiday tourism. Iran’s Vice President for tourism Esfandyar Rahim Mashaii said that drivers could claim the extra allowance by providing their details on a special Internet site to be launched in a week. “Whether you have taken your summer holidays or not, you can fill in the form and this quota will be given to you,” he told state television. “Of course some people will not register, this means they do not want the extra quota and thus will help Iran’s economy,” he added. Iranian families are traditionally inveterate travellers over the summer months, driving to resorts along the Caspian Sea and historic cities to escape the worst of the heat. However many have complained this year that their petrol quotas are barely sufficient for travel within Tehran and other cities, ruling out holiday trips by private cars.

The petrol rationing has been implemented through smart cards which drivers use each time they buy petrol and keep track of their purchases. The announcement of the extra petrol comes just ahead of an extended holiday weekend in Iran to celebrate the birthday of the “hidden” 12th imam of Shiite Islam, when hundreds of thousands are expected to take to the roads. Many Iranians will only now be starting their main summer holidays, taking advantage of the cooler September weather and with schools still out for another month. “The aim of this decision is to boost the tourist industry because of the role travel plays in the psychological health of the people,” said the government committee overseeing the plan. But Gholam Hossein Nozari, who became caretaker oil minister following the sacking of Kazem Vaziri Hamaneh earlier this month, said on Friday that “it does not appear we can allocate a special quota for tourism.” “Everyone in this country is interested in tourism and is looking for an excuse to receive petrol for this purpose,” Nozari said, according to the IRNA agency.

Iran, OPEC’s number two oil producer, in late June finally implemented a long-awaited plan to ration petrol to decrease the colossal state subsidies paid for keeping pump prices low. The announcement triggered angry protests, with demonstrators torching petrol stations and yelling slogans against the government, but these rapidly petered out. Despite recent price rises, the subsidies mean Iranian drivers are still paying less for their petrol — 1,000 rials (0.10 dollars) per litre — than for the comparable amount of mineral water. The government has rejected demands from parliament for motorists to make purchases in excess of their quota at much higher non-subsidised prices, meaning that all Iranians have to obey the rationing limits.

Source: AFP

Posted by Editors at 15:36:55 | Permalink | No Comments »

Iran’s people await their share of riches

 Hussein Alinejad earns just $217 a month selling fragrant kebabs of chicken and lamb in a steamy shop here, and he knew Iran’s leader couldn’t help but be moved by his plight. So when President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad came to town in December, Alinejad wrote him a letter explaining his circumstances.

He had three children, and a nice piece of land, but no money to build a house. Could he perhaps have a bank loan? Twenty days later, he got a call from the Imam Khomeini Relief Committee, a charity linked to the government: “Come and get the answer to your letter.” When he arrived, someone handed him an envelope with more than a week’s salary inside, his to keep. And his loan application was under review.

But it’s been eight months since the president came through, and Alinejad still hasn’t heard anything about his loan. A friend got one, but couldn’t afford to buy more than a small garden plot with the money.

Across this city and other areas of relatively prosperous Mazandaran province in northern Iran, one of many rural regions where Ahmadinejad has enjoyed enthusiastic support since his election in 2005, there are growing worries that the trickle-down oil revenue the president promised has trickled only so far. As the Islamic Republic increasingly struggles with deep-rooted economic problems, some here are starting to mutter about broken promises.

Ahmadinejad’s domestic popularity has its roots, in part, in his frequent and well-received jaunts to the provinces, armed with promises of low-interest bank loans and “justice” shares in Iranian companies and plenty of reassuring speeches about Iran’s enduring invincibility.

“Justice means that all talents should be developed. All sections of the country should taste development and enjoy its assets,” he said as he arrived here in Mazandaran, a farm-studded greenbelt of 2.6 million people. “Where there is tyranny, poverty and humiliation, it indicates that some have forgotten God, the messages of prophets and people’s love.”

Even with his loan in limbo, Alinejad is a big fan of the president, whose government has drawn criticism among urbane residents of the capital, Tehran, for mismanaging the economy, cracking down on dissent and getting in fights with the West.

“He is perfect in the way he talks to the people,” he said recently. “He tours the country; he has contact with the real people. I admire that a lot. This city has been ignored by every single president, until him.”

But many others here are tired of giving Ahmadinejad the benefit of the doubt.

“People understand that this country has been through a lot, including eight years of war. There were many martyrs, lots of suffering, all that is true. But now we are in the middle of an oil boom. So what is the share of the people?” said Abbas Tabakkal Shahmirzadi, who writes on the economy and social issues for the local newspaper.

“I didn’t bother to go see him, and I don’t think he’s all that popular, personally,” Faramaz Moghimi, a 56-year-old high school physics teacher, said of the president’s visit. “He’s not convincing people that, OK, I’m serious about rebuilding this town.”

Across the country, the government is doling out oil cash as it grapples with more fundamental economic problems stemming from Iran’s international isolation, large numbers of unemployed graduates and steep inflation fueled in part by the government handouts.

Teachers launched protests over low wages in March and April, resulting in hundreds of arrests.

Factory workers have staged similar protests in recent months over unpaid wages, some going back months.

In June, 57 economists issued an open letter warning that “government mismanagement is inflicting a huge cost on the economy,” with the current high oil prices only “delaying the imminent economic crisis.”

“What you need to understand is that every 1% increase in inflation means that 100,000 Iranian people go under the poverty line,” said Saeed Leylaz, a Tehran-based business consultant. “And the most pressure of inflation is not over people in Tehran, it is over the poor people in the provinces. And they are much, much more under pressure than they were two or three years ago.”

In his free-spending trips to the provinces, Leylaz said, “Mr. Ahmadinejad is trying to exchange the oil income of petrodollars into loyalty, in one sentence. But day by day, this is working less and less.”

Ghaemshahr, a city of half a million people about 100 miles northeast of Tehran, was once one of Iran’s most successful industrial towns. Its five textile mills once employed more than 6,000 people in decent-paying jobs, turning out fabrics, uniforms and industrial storage bags that were sold all over Iran.

The city’s troubles long predate Iran’s current government. Like those in failing textile towns around the world, Ghaemshahr’s aging mills found themselves ill-equipped in a globalized world to compete with cheap labor and materials from farther east in Asia. Worse, eight years of war with Iraq in the 1980s saw much of the city’s workforce deployed to the front; afterward, aging skilled workers were often laid off in favor of unskilled war veterans.

In the early years after the 1979 Islamic Revolution, the government was reluctant to import spare parts from Europe and the U.S. Instead, it insisted on manufacturing inferior replacements inside Iran and, later, on shutting down functioning equipment to provide spare parts for other machines.

Eventually, many of the remaining machines broke down too.Now, only three of the original five factories are still open, and they are producing very little, said Aliasghar Moghaddesi, until recently manager of the Goni Bafi Bag Factory in Ghaemshahr.

“These factories need only two things, I can tell you. One, a healthy management, and two, to be updated,” Moghaddesi said. “But politics and industry cannot be compatible, and slogans from politicians cannot do anything.”

Sitting in his villa on the edge of the city, looking out on the blue-misted foothills of the Alborz Mountains and a lush garden of bitter oranges and figs, Moghaddesi nodded in approval as his gardener shot one of a cluster of marauding magpies and impaled its carcass on a pole, as a warning to the others.

His own factory, he said, fell victim to aging equipment, an increasingly unskilled workforce and the fact that the sturdy jute bags the mill produced for farms all over Iran were undercut by cheaper, more versatile jute- reinforced polyester bags from Bangladesh.

He retired and is supporting his wife and grown children on his pension and savings.

“Two of my children are doing military service. Two of them are university graduates, jobless,” he said.

The Ahmadinejad government announced last year that it was building a $1.3-million technical and vocational training center for women in Ghaemshahr, scheduled to open by 2009.

Such initiatives are welcome here, but many also wonder whether there will be jobs for the women once they graduate.

Zahra Alinia, 30, lives with four of her five brothers at her father’s home in Sayyad Kola, a sleepy village of huts and barns surrounded by emerald rice paddies. Neither she nor her brothers can afford to take a job in town: Renting a house would be too expensive, and bus or taxi fare back and forth also would be prohibitively costly.

“I went in for one of these government loans,” Alinia said. “I intended to get a loan to buy a piece of land or a house, so I could be on my own and earn a living, so as at this age not to have to beg for money from my parents,” she said.

“At the beginning, they said I could have 1 million tomans [about $1,080],” she said. “But when I returned to the bank after two months of red tape, they said no, it will be only half a million tomans.

“And at the beginning, Ahmadinejad said these loans were going to be without interest. But actually, it has 3.5% interest. And the first two installments had to be paid back right away. So at the end of the day, I couldn’t do anything with it, actually.”

She laughed bitterly. “I may one day go and buy a bracelet.”

The president, she said, “only provides empty talk — slogans.”

Her father looked at her sternly. “Ahmadinejad is a good guy,” he interjected. “But his entourage around the administration are not doing his will. They’re not delivering.”

Alinia held her father’s eyes for a long moment. Then he looked away.

Source: The Los Angeles Time

Posted by Editors at 15:35:26 | Permalink | No Comments »

Iran wins title of 2007 Boy’s Youth Volleyball World Championship

Iran’s Junior National Volleyball Team beat China 3-2 to win the title of 2007 Youth Volleyball World Championship Contests in Mexico. This is the first time Iran has won the title of at any tournaments. Iran won the seminal by defeating France 3-0.

 

Posted by Editors at 00:45:55 | Permalink | No Comments »

Iran Moves To Assert Power In The Middle East

The Shia-led, non-Arab country has not only challenged the United States and its Arab allies throughout the Middle East, but it also has become the biggest beneficiary of U.S. involvement in Iraq, experts say. By eliminating Saddam Hussein — Iran’s sworn enemy — and installing

a Shia-dominated government for the first time in Iraq’s history, the United States strengthened Iran’s clerical regime both in its battle with internal dissidents and in its struggle with Sunni Arab governments.0826 03

“Without lifting a finger, the Iranians became the most dominant regional power,” said Diaa Rashwan, a senior researcher at Al-Ahram Center for Strategic and Political Studies in Cairo.

An avowed enemy of Israel and the United States, which accuses Iran of trying to develop nuclear weapons, Tehran also has the Sunni-dominated Arab world on edge. Among the concerns: the regional ascendancy of Iran, its nuclear program, its growing influence on the Iraqi leadership and its involvement in other countries with large Shia communities, especially Lebanon.

And the direction of the war in Iraq has heightened the anxiety. “All regimes in the Middle East recognize that America has lost the war in Iraq,” said Marwan Kabalan, a political science professor at Damascus University. “They’re all maneuvering to protect their interests and to gain something out of the American defeat. … Everyone is fighting battles through local proxies. It’s like the Cold War.”

The regional conflict is playing out on three fronts. In Iraq, neighboring Sunni regimes such as Saudi Arabia are backing Sunni militants, while Iran supports Shia militias. In Lebanon, Hezbollah — a Shia militia backed by Iran and its less powerful ally, Syria — has been trying for months to topple a government aligned with Washington and authoritarian Sunni Arab regimes. And in the Palestinian territories, Iran and Syria are supporting Hamas, while the United States and its Arab allies are backing beleaguered Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and his Fatah movement.

“All of the region’s crises are now interconnected, thanks to the war in Iraq,” said Rashwan. “Nothing can be resolved without the Americans finding a way out of Iraq.”

Today, just about anyone associated with the United States is viewed in the Arab world as a traitor, starting with the Shia-dominated government in Baghdad. “Even though their leaders are allied with America, Arabs are more angry at America than ever before,” said Mohammad Salah, Cairo bureau chief of Al-Hayat, a pan-Arab newspaper. “They don’t want any more American meddling in the region. … They don’t trust any government that is supported by Washington.”

The Bush administration has become so unpopular in the region that even some of its staunchest allies are trying to publicly distance themselves from it. No Arab regime is closer to Washington than Saudi Arabia, the second largest foreign oil provider to the United States. But at an Arab League summit in March, Saudi King Abdullah for the first time harshly criticized the U.S. military presence in Iraq, calling it an “illegitimate foreign occupation.”

That statement was aimed at appeasing Arab masses angry about the growing bloodshed in Iraq and Arab regimes’ continued alliance with Washington. Abdullah’s comment resonated well in the Arab world, with analysts, newspaper columnists and average citizens praising the kingdom for challenging U.S. policies.

“Saudi Arabia’s rulers view themselves as the rightful leaders of the Muslim world, but Iran is challenging that leadership right now,” said Rashwan. “The Saudis must try to show that they can be independent from America.”

Although Saudi Arabia has a Sunni majority, its rulers fear Iran’s potential influence over a sizable and sometimes-restive Shia population concentrated in the kingdom’s oil-rich Eastern Province. In neighboring Bahrain, another key American ally in the Persian Gulf, the Shia majority is chafing under Sunni rulers, who also fear Iran’s reach.

The Saudis have tried to pursue their own agenda in the Middle East, apart from Washington’s. In February, Abdullah brokered an agreement between Hamas and Fatah for a unity government in the Palestinian territories. By June, the deal collapsed and Hamas took control of Gaza by force, prompting Abbas to dissolve the unity government.

“The traditional powers in the Arab world are working behind the scenes to undermine Iran’s influence,” said Kabalan. “One way they can do that is by showing some progress on Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, even if it’s not real progress.”

The Hamas takeover was a victory for Iran, which sent tens of millions of dollars to the militant group since it won Palestinian parliamentary elections in January 2006. “While the Americans and Europeans were trying to isolate Hamas by cutting off all funding to the Palestinians, Iran moved in to help Hamas,” said Salah. “The West gave Iran this opportunity to increase its influence.”

Arab leaders are not worried that Iran will export the cultural and theological aspects of Shiism; rather, analysts say, they’re afraid of political Shiism spreading to the Arab world through groups like Hezbollah. The Shia militia’s strong showing against a far superior Israeli military during last summer’s war in Lebanon has electrified the Arab world, and Hezbollah’s actions offer a stark contrast to Arab rulers cooperating with the United States.

“Iran has been successful in its support of Hezbollah and Hamas,” said Amal Saad-Ghorayeb, an expert on the Shia and a visiting scholar at the Carnegie Middle East Center in Beirut. “Arab regimes now fear that their Sunni populations will be seduced by Iran and Hezbollah’s message of challenging the United States and empowering the dispossessed.”

There is a historical precedent for this. The 1979 Islamic Revolution, a popular uprising led by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini against the U.S.-backed shah, inspired revolutionary zeal among nationalists throughout the Arab world. The revolution’s aftershocks were felt for a long time in the Middle East, helping, indirectly, to give rise to some militant Sunni movements and inspiring Shia communities in Lebanon and Iraq. Nowhere was that influence more deeply felt than in Lebanon, where Iran helped create Hezbollah after the Israeli invasion of 1982.

Fearful of this new challenge from Shias to become the torch-bearers of Arab nationalism, the Saudis are trying to reassert their role as leaders of the Arab and wider Muslim world. In his speech at the Arab summit, Abdullah insisted that only when Arab leaders unite will they “be able to prevent foreign powers from shaping the region’s future” - a reference to both the United States and Iran.

“The Middle East is at a historical juncture,” said Rashwan. “It’s not simply the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, but events in Iraq and Iran that will have a profound impact on the future of the Arab world.”

Q&A

What are the historical roots of the split between the major sects of Islam (Sunni and Shia)?

After the death of the Prophet Muhammad in 632, there was a dispute about who should succeed him as leader (or caliph) of the Muslim community. One faction (which later became the Sunnis) argued that the prophet’s closest companion, Abu Bakr, should become caliph. Another faction (which became the Shias) argued that succession should be hereditary and that the most fitting successor was the prophet’s cousin and son-in-law, Ali. They argued that Muhammad had designated Ali to succeed him. Ultimately, Abu Bakr was chosen as caliph by a vote of Muslim leaders.

In 656, Ali became the fourth caliph of Islam. Shortly afterward, a civil war broke out among Muslim factions and Ali restored order by reaching a compromise with his enemies. That infuriated some of his most hardline supporters. In 661, as he prayed in a mosque near the Iraqi city of Kufa, Ali was assassinated by a former follower. He was the first of 12 Shia imams, or successors to Muhammad, whom Shia believers regard as divinely motivated and infallible (although they do not view them as prophets).

Nineteen years after Ali’s death, two of his sons, Hussein and Abbas, were killed in battle in the Iraqi city of Karbala. The violent deaths of Ali and his sons became the defining factor in the split between Shia and Sunni sects. They also made martyrdom one of the most important tenets of Shiism.

What are the differences between the sects?

The distinctions between Shia and Sunni Islam are similar to those between Catholic and Protestant branches of Christianity, involving style of ritual and philosophical orientation rather than fundamental pillars of faith. Both sects follow Islam’s five basic pillars: the profession of faith in God, daily prayers, giving alms, fasting during the holy month of Ramadan and making a pilgrimage to the holy city of Mecca at least once in a lifetime.

Sunnis and Shias follow different schools of Islamic law, which deal with marriage, divorce and rules of inheritance. The Shia clergy is more hierarchical, and Shias generally choose an ayatollah to emulate.

What are the sources of modern conflict between the two sects?

Today, the vast majority (about 85 percent) of the world’s 1.4 billion Muslims are Sunnis. The rest are Shias, with under 1 percent comprising smaller sects.

In some countries - Iran, Iraq and Bahrain - Shia are a majority. In Lebanon, they are the largest sect, making up about 40 percent of the population. In several oil-rich Persian Gulf countries - notably Saudi Arabia and Kuwait - the Shia are a sizable minority ruled by the Sunni majority.

Many Sunnis criticize the Shia for developing rituals not mentioned in the Quran or Sunnah, a collection of the sayings and actions of Muhammad. These rituals include veneration of Shia imams, frequent pilgrimages to Shia shrines and slight variations in daily prayers. In many countries, the conflict between Sunnis and Shias is largely over political power. In Iraq, for example, the Shia majority was suppressed during Saddam Hussein’s Sunni-dominated rule. While the majority of Sunnis accept Shias as Muslims, some extremist Sunnis regard them as heretics who should be killed.

 by Mohamad Bazzi, The Newsday

Posted by Editors at 00:41:43 | Permalink | No Comments »

Sarkozy cautions against attack on Iran

French President Nicolas Sarkozy warned Monday that it would be “catastrophic” to resort to military force in confronting Iran over its suspect nuclear program. “For me, Iran having a nuclear weapon is unacceptable,” Sarkozy said in his first major address on foreign policy, but he stressed that he opposed an attack on the Islamic regime and urged that the West rely on diplomacy.

He said Iran can choose between dialogue with the international community or more U.N. sanctions. “This tactic is the only one that allows us to escape from a catastrophic alternative: an Iranian bomb, or the bombing of Iran,” he said. Sarkozy also said Iran is entitled to use nuclear power for civilian needs, such as generating electricity. If countries like Iran run out of fossil fuels, and “if they don’t have the right to the energy of the future, then we will create conditions of misery and underdevelopment, and therefore an explosion of terrorism,” Sarkozy said. In other areas, the new president signaled a shift in tone from his predecessor, Jacques Chirac, casting himself as a “friend of Israel” and taking a tougher line on Russia and China. But despite his admiration for the United States, Sarkozy said Chirac was right to oppose the war in Iraq, which he called a mistake. Sarkozy took over from fellow conservative Chirac in May pledging to boost France’s international stature. The energetic new leader quickly scored a few high-profile diplomatic coups, such as helping secure freedom for six Bulgarian medical workers jailed in Libya for nine years on charges of deliberately infecting children with AIDS. Yet the sdiplomatic agenda he outlined Monday was relatively modest. He proposed, for example, a committee of great minds to reflect on the future of the European Union — an unassuming proposal for the EU, which Sarkozy nonetheless called France’s “absolute priority.”

He also eased his opposition to Turkey’s bid for membership in the EU, which he previously vowed to block. On Monday, Sarkozy said he would not oppose new talks with the Muslim state, while adding the discussions should examine the idea of a weaker alliance than membership. “A few months after taking the presidency, Nicolas Sarkozy is realizing that he has limited room for maneuvering,” said Philippe Moreau-Defarges of the French Institute for International Relations. Sarkozy’s tough language about China and Russia set him apart from Chirac, who was often criticized for too-cozy ties with authoritarian leaders. Sarkozy warned Russia against exercising its energy exports with “brutality.” And he said China was “transforming its insatiable quest for raw materials into a strategy of control, notably in Africa.” While France has a history of close ties with the Arab world, Sarkozy said: “I have the reputation of being a friend of Israel, and it’s true. I will never compromise on Israel’s security.” Despite that, he said, the many Arab leaders who have visited him since his election know they can count on his friendship. Sarkozy, who spent his summer holiday in New England and whose affection for the U.S. earned him the nickname “Sarko the American,” sent his foreign minister to Iraq last week to smooth over ties that were strained when Chirac opposed the U.S.-led invasion. But friendly relations do not mean there cannot be differences of opinion, Sarkozy said Monday. “France was, and still is, hostile to the war,” he said, calling for a timetable for the withdrawal of foreign troops.

Though he criticized the U.S. over Iraq, Sarkozy showed his commitment to the security effort in Afghanistan by pledging more troops to train the Afghan army — following months of speculation about France’s commitment to that international force. Closer to home, Sarkozy reiterated his proposal for a “Mediterranean Union” to bridge the divide between Europe and North Africa. The idea echoes a concept dear to Chirac, who called for a “dialogue of cultures” to counteract the forces of extremism. Francois Heisbourg, a leading expert on French strategic and foreign policy, said that even when Sarkozy was sending a message of continuity, his style differed dramatically from Chirac’s oratory flourishes. Sarkozy is “clear talk — no punches pulled, no dancing around words. This was very deliberate,” Heisbourg said. “It’s a message to the Iranians, but it’s also a message to the Russians and the Chinese — that is, that if you want us to have a serious chance to try to avoid getting … into this awful alternative, you’d better be serious in the Security Council.” Source: The Associated Press

Posted by Editors at 00:37:56 | Permalink | No Comments »