Friday, September 21, 2007

French official backs hard line on Iran

French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner met Friday with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice amid U.S. expressions of satisfaction that his government is taking a harder line on Iran’s nuclear program. In a speech Thursday, Kouchner added to a slew of tough comments he has made lately on Iran.

He also stressed that he believes France and the United States have emerged from a period of severe strain in relations stemming from differences over Iraq. He said that France would push for Europe to play a bigger role in international affairs but not at the expense of American power. “A stronger Europe is absolutely not incompatible with the trans-Atlantic relationship,” Kouchner said. On Iran, Kouchner expanded on the recommendation earlier Thursday by his boss, President Nicolas Sarkozy, for tightening international sanctions against Iran. The French government has also said it will seek European Union sanctions against Iran, a move that the United States says it welcomes. “I think it is extremely helpful that the international community continues to take actions that we mean business when it comes to dealing with their nuclear program,” a State Department spokesman, Tom Casey, said Friday of the French stance.

The two countries were preparing the groundwork for the new United Nations Security Council resolution at a meeting in Washington on Friday of political directors from six key nations that have been trying to negotiate with Iran — Russia, China, Britain and Germany, as well as France and the U.S. The French government’s tougher line has brought it closer to the Bush administration, which has made a renewed U.S. push to tighten sanctions. On Sunday, Kouchner sparked an outcry at home and abroad by saying the world should be prepared for “the worst” over Iran’s nuclear program — or “war.” He later backtracked, and in his speech Thursday, he said he had not been advocating military confrontation.

“We will do everything in our power to avoid the dreadful alternative laid out by President Sarkozy: the Iranian bomb or bombing of Iran,” Kouchner said. Kouchner said that France sees a nuclear-armed Iran as a threat to global security. “To those who say that we should handle Iran with kid gloves, since it could destabilize the region, I say this: look at its adventurism today and imagine what it would be like if Tehran thought itself one day protected by a nuclear umbrella,” he said. The tougher position is likely to be welcomed in Washington. Earlier Thursday, Kouchner discussed Iran and other issues with lawmakers and with Defense Secretary Robert Gates. At a news conference Thursday, President George W. Bush was asked about Kouchner’s earlier statement about confrontation with Iran and said: “I have consistently stated I am hopeful we can convince the Iranian regime to give up” any nuclear ambitions it has. Kouchner also touched on talk by his government of boosting its role in NATO. France has been a member since the organization was founded in 1949.

However, Gen. Charles de Gaulle pulled France out of NATO’s integrated military structure in 1966, refusing to put his troops under NATO command or to host NATO bases, a decision that damaged trans-Atlantic ties for years. Kouchner said that France would rethink its relationship to NATO in the context of strengthening the European Union’s independent defense capabilities. “It is only in the framework of strengthening of European defense that we will consider how our role in NATO might change,” he said. In his meetings with Rice and national security adviser Stephen Hadley, Kouchner was also expected to talk about peace talks in the Middle East and the future of Kosovo, a province of Serbia that aspires to independence. Kouchner said that France welcomed a U.S.-sponsored conference on the Middle East planned for November and was prepared to help U.S. efforts.

He said it was essential that Europe and the United States maintain a united position on Kosovo in internationally brokered talks, which have been deadlocked because of Kosovo’s demand for independence and Serbia’s refusal to give it. Kouchner, who previously served as the United Nations’ administrator in Kosovo, recently suggested that talks on the territory’s future could be extended by six months beyond a December deadline already agreed to by the United States and Kosovo. The United States probably would oppose that. Kouchner’s talks with U.S. officials also are likely to touch on the violence in Iraq and Darfur and on global warming. On that last theme, Kouchner could not help tweaking the Bush administration. “A great nation like the United States has a duty not to impede efforts to combat global warming, one of the major challenges of this century,” he said.

Source: AP

Posted by Editors at 18:11:25 | Permalink | No Comments »

Khatami ponders 2009 Iran poll

Iran’s reform-minded former president, Mohammad Khatami, is considering running for the 2009 elections in the apparent hope that he will be seen as a saviour who can extricate Iran from domestic and international troubles.

 

While cautioning that it is still early days, close allies of Mr Khatami say he remains one of the rare personalities in Iran who has enough appeal to wrest the presidency from fundamentalists. “He is willing to run and we think he’ll win in a landslide if elections were held now. But we still have to wait and test the waters in due time,” said one ally.

Another ally said Mr Khatami had become increasingly pessimistic about Iran’s prospects, with the escalation of the nuclear dispute with the west and the deterioration of relations with Europe under the radical President Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad.

Diplomats from the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council are to meet in Washington on Friday to discuss further action against Iran over its refusal to suspend its uranium enrichment activities.

“He thinks both domestic and international developments will go in such a wrong direction that the regime [leaders] will ask him to run to help the survival of the system,” said the ally.

Whether this proves to be merely wishful thinking remains to be seen. Mr Khatami, who governed from 1997-2005 with a reformist agenda that advocated “religious democracy” at home and detente with the west, ended his second term disillusioned and facing accusations that he had disappointed his support base.

While hardliners blocked some of his key reforms, including attempts to expand the powers of the presidency, his followers became disenchanted with his inclination to compromise rather than confront his opponents.

His government’s emphasis on political reform – overshadowing attention to social and economic problems – also proved costly, facilitating the rise of the populist Mr Ahmadi-Nejad.

In the absence of credible opinion polls, it is difficult to gauge the popularity of either man.

But Mr Khatami has joined forces with the so-called conservative pragmatists – the moderate conservatives close to Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, also a former president – to undermine Mr Ahmadi-Nejad.

They are hoping that within two years, the president’s populist economic policies – to reduce inflation and tackle unemployment – would have sufficiently backfired and provoked an erosion of popular support.

The first test of their political weight will be in the parliamentary elections in March. Radical forces in the regime, however, are already mobilising against Mr Khatami.

The conservative media posted a video in June showing him shaking hands with Italian women during a visit, something considered taboo by the clergy.

His denial of the incident did not stop young radical clerics in the holy city of Qom from taking his case to the Special Court for Clergy and calling for him to be defrocked.

Analysts said the case showed that radicals might be looking to disqualify Mr Khatami from the presidential poll.

According to the constitution, the Guardian Council has to vet presidential candidates for their belief in Islam and the principles of the regime.

Source: The Finanical Times

Posted by Editors at 18:10:07 | Permalink | No Comments »

Columbia Univeristy won’t cancel Ahmadinejad speech

Columbia University said it does not plan to call off a speech by Iran’s president despite pressure from critics including the City Council speaker, who said the Ivy League school was providing a forum for “hate-mongering vitriol.” Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is traveling to New York to address the United Nations’ General Assembly.

He was to appear Monday at a question-and-answer session with Columbia faculty and students as part of the school’s World Leaders Forum. The State Department calls Iran a state sponsor of terror, and Ahmadinejad has called the Holocaust “a myth” and urged for Israel to be destroyed. City Council speaker Christine Quinn called Thursday for the university to rescind the invitation, saying “the idea of Ahmadinejad as an honored guest anywhere in our city is offensive to all New Yorkers.” Quinn, a Democrat, said Ahmadinejad was coming to the city “for one reason — to spread his hate-mongering vitriol on the world stage.”

His planned appearance at Columbia also was condemned by Jewish groups including the Jewish Defense Organization, which described Ahmadinejad as “the Hitler of Iran.” Columbia spokesman Robert Hornsby said Thursday there was no plan to cancel the appearance, though the university dropped plans for an Ahmadinejad speech last year because of security and logistical problems. The decision came after a Jewish activist group expressed outrage over the invitation. Mayor Michael Bloomberg said Friday that the university was free to invite Ahmadinejad to speak, but “personally, I wouldn’t go to listen to him — I don’t care about what he says.”

White House deputy press secretary Tony Fratto said Friday that the Bush administration had no involvement with Columbia’s decision. “This is a country where people can come and speak their minds,” he said, adding, “It would be wonderful if some of the countries that take advantage of that here allowed it for their own citizens there.” Columbia President Lee Bollinger, in announcing Ahmadinejad’s upcoming appearance, described the event as part of “Columbia’s long-standing tradition of serving as a major forum for robust debate.”

He said the Iranian president had agreed to answer questions on Israel and the Holocaust. Ahmadinejad’s trip to New York also ignited a debate this week over his rejected request to lay a wreath at ground zero. Politicians and families of Sept. 11 victims were outraged that Iran’s president might visit the site. Police rejected Ahmadinejad’s request, citing construction and security concerns. In an interview scheduled to air Sunday on CBS’ “60 Minutes,” Ahmadinejad indicated he would not press the issue but expressed disbelief that the visit would offend Americans.

Source: AP

Posted by Editors at 18:09:13 | Permalink | No Comments »