Tuesday, October 2, 2007

Larijani: Iran ready to work with US on Iraq

Iran is ready to help the US stabilise Iraq if Washington presents a timetable for a withdrawal of its troops, Tehran’s top security official said on Sunday.

 

In an interview with the Financial Times, Ali Larijani, head of the Supreme National Security Council, which answers to Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader, rejected Washington’s accusations that Tehran is providing weapons to Iraqi militias, insisting the trouble with Iraq was that the US administration was pursuing a “dead-end strategy”.

Mr Larijani maintained it was time world powers realised Iran’s nuclear progress could not be reversed and that they should enter into negotiations with Tehran without preconditions.

Pledging to continue co­operation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nation’s nuclear watchdog, he made clear, however, that Iran would not suspend its ­uranium enrichment programme – a key Security Council demand. But he said he was open to “ideas being put on the table” in forthcoming talks with Javier Solana, the European Union foreign policy chief, to resolve the nuclear stand-off.

Mr Larijani suggested that both the US Democratic party and the British were getting it right in Iraq. The Democrats’ push for a timetable for withdrawal “seems to be logical”, he said, and the British were “more intelligent than the Americans”, having made the “necessary adjustments” and retreated to Basra airport.

“If they [the Americans] have a clear definition of a timetable we’ll help them materialise it,” Mr Larijani said. “If the US is persisting with its mistakes, it shouldn’t ask for help from us.”

The US has repeatedly accused Iran of undermining security in Iraq by supplying advanced roadside bombs and Iranian-made rockets to Shia militias. The US Senate last week called for the ­Revolutionary Guards, the elite force allegedly involved in Iraq, to be designated as a “foreign terrorist organisation”.

Political analysts say Iran’s strategy is to back the Shia-dominated government in Baghdad but also to ensure that the US does not leave Iraq emboldened to carry on another military campaign. Three rounds of talks between US and Iranian officials have been held in Baghdad but do not appear to have produced tangible results.

Mr Larijani, however, dismissed US accusations as “lies”. He said Iran had asked for names of Revolutionary Guard personnel that the US said were involved in helping Iraqi groups but that it had received no response.

He said Iran was the only country in the region to have supported the Iraqi government and the democratic process, while the US’s allies – by which he meant Arab governments – provided no assistance and worked against Washington.

He also claimed Tehran had information that US officials were holding talks with Izzat al-Douri, the former Ba’athist senior official who is said to be leading parts of the Sunni insurgency. “This is a disaster for the Iraqi people,” he said.

At a time of growing suspicion that either the US or Israel will resort to military strikes to prevent Tehran from pursuing its nuclear programme, Mr Larijani said Washington’s failures in Iraq should be a warning against embarking on a new “adventure”.

Refusing to specify what Tehran’s retaliation might be, he warned that the US should attack Iran if it wished “to receive Israel on a wheelchair” and predicted that Washington would be “sticking its hand into a ­beehive”.

Addressing the nuclear programme, Mr Larijani said it had reached an advanced stage, providing Iran with a “full command of the technology” that no one could take away. “This status cannot be ignored. I’m surprised to hear [uranium enrichment] suspension is still being talked about.”

On Friday six world powers failed to agree on a new UN sanctions resolution but gave Iran until late next month to curb its nuclear programme and are now waiting for reports from the IAEA and from Mr Solana.

Iran agreed with the IAEA a “work plan” in late August, in which it pledged to clear up issues that have raised suspicions about its nuclear intentions. The deal encouraged Russia and China to block an immediate new round of sanctions but was criticised by the US and its European allies as vague and open-ended.

Mr Larijani said the agreement with the IAEA was not a delaying tactic. Whether all the issues would be cleared by next month, however, depended on the speed with which the nuclear watchdog operated, he said. “The more acceleration there is by the agency, the faster it will be completed.”

Source: Financial Times

Posted by Editors at 15:59:50 | Permalink | No Comments »

Iran University Invites Bush

An Iranian university has invited US President George W. Bush to talk on campus, a week after his Iranian counterpart Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was given a frosty reception at a US institute, the press reported on Monday.

The head of Ferdowsi University in Iran’s second city of Mashhad, one of the oldest universities in the country, said Bush should visit to answer questions from students and lecturers on human rights and terrorism.

“President Bush is invited to give a speech and respond to numerous questions, must notably about human rights, terrorism and the Holocaust,” said university president Alireza Afshour, according to the government daily Iran.

“This is what President Ahmadinejad did, despite the lack of respect shown towards him,” he added.

Before a speech to Columbia University in New York on September 25, Ahmadinejad was introduced by the university’s president Lee Bollinger as a “petty and cruel dictator” and then endured jeering during his talk.

He then answered a barrage of questions from the audience, asserting to widespread disbelief that there were “no homosexuals” in Iran. His reception was condemned as insulting across the political spectrum in Iran.

Ahmadinejad had said after his return from the United States, where he also gave a speech to the United Nations, that Bush would be allowed to give a speech at an Iranian university if he so wished.

However given the current hostility between the two arch enemies over Iran’s nuclear drive and alleged support for militants in Iraq, there appears little chance of such a visit taking place in reality.

Iran and the United States have not had diplomatic relations for the past 27 years after Washington cut ties in the wake of a siege of its embassy in Tehran by Islamist students.

Source: AFP

Posted by Editors at 15:49:55 | Permalink | No Comments »

Iranian Workers Protest For Third Day Over Unpaid Wages

Hundreds of Iranian factory workers have protested for a third day in the western city of Shush demanding that they receive unpaid wages.

The workers at the Neyshekar Haftapeh factory, which produces sugar, say they haven’t been paid for more than two months. They are also calling for better working conditions.

They were watched by security forces who reportedly videotaped the protest.

Workers chanted slogans against officials, saying that “a decent life” was their “absolute right,” Radio Farda reported.

Reports say Shush Governor Mohammad Hassan Taravar has threatened the workers and said that their protest will be met with force. Today four who were detained a day earlier were released.

Some of the leaders of the workers told Radio Farda that they are hiding in fear of being arrested.

Labor protests have increased in Iran in recent months due to a poor economy and the rising price of basic goods.

The government has reacted by arresting a number of workers and sentencing them to jail and whippings.

The head of the Tehran bus drivers’ union, Mansur Osanlu, was arrested and jailed on July 10, though he has not been officially charged with any crimes. Ibrahim Madadi, the deputy head of the bus drivers’ union, was arrested a month later with six other activists when they went to visit Osanlu’s family.

Source: Radio Farda

Posted by Editors at 15:43:50 | Permalink | No Comments »

Heard on the Street

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is a lucky man. Even Amir supports him. Amir is a gay Iranian who left the country five years ago and now lives with his boyfriend in London. (He uses a pseudonym because he still hasn’t told his family about his sexual orientation.)

When Ahmadinejad claimed during a question-and-answer session at Columbia University last week that no gays lived in Iran, “[it] made me laugh,” says Amir. “Ahmadinejad is an ignorant and uncultured man who doesn’t know much about anything beyond the world of radical Muslims and Revolutionary Guards.” Yet Amir was incensed at the hectoring introduction from Columbia’s president, Lee Bollinger, during which he described his guest as “a petty and cruel dictator.” “He is still the elected president of my country,” Amir says. “Insulting him in front of the world is insulting all Iranians.” Iranians both inside and outside the country closely followed the vitriolic reception Ahmadinejad received in New York last week. (One tabloid declared THE EVIL HAS LANDED on his first day in town.) But if critics like Bollinger thought they were demonstrating solidarity with Iran’s long-suffering moderates, they were mistaken. “The Islamic Republic and its president have never been insulted in an official setting like this,” says Mohsen Armin, a prominent reformist politician. Dissident bloggers also came out in support of Ahmadinejad. Other opponents argue that he should have walked off the stage at Columbia in protest. Former president Mohammed Khatami agreed with Amir: “This is tantamount to insulting our nation,” he told the Iranian Students’ News Agency. In an Iranian culture that prizes hospitality to guests—and that loves a good martyr—Ahmadinejad will arguably return to Tehran in a stronger position than when he left. Prior to his New York trip, in fact, the Iranian president was struggling at home. With oil prices at nearly $80 a barrel, ordinary Iranians expect Ahmadinejad to fulfill his promises to fill their bellies and their wallets. Yet rents and food prices continue to rise, making most feel poorer than ever.

Infighting within the government has led to a number of high-profile resignations—forced and voluntary—over the last few months. Crackdowns on young women with too-stylish headscarves, on young men with tattoos and too much gel in their hairdos—even on pet-shop owners—have alienated the middle classes. That’s not to mention the onslaught against feminists, labor activists and teachers. Several officials close to the Iranian leadership, who declined to be identified discussing internal deliberations, say that in recent months Ahmadinejad has been advised by Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to be less combative. Prior to the president’s trip, Khamenei dispatched emissaries to Europe and to Arab capitals to soothe worries over Iran’s nuclear program and its influence in Iraq. In interviews just before leaving, Ahmadinejad also sounded much milder than before.

And in any case, Iranians understand that he has far less power than is commonly realized by outsiders—he is neither head of state nor the commander in chief. That’s why many are puzzled by the treatment he received in New York. “Ahmadinejad tried not to be too controversial or instigate anyone during this trip,” says reformist politician Hossein Marashi, the brother-in-law of Ahmadinejad’s archenemy, former Iranian president Hashemi Rafsanjani. The reception, he says, “manifested the weakness of political culture [in America].” The on-and-off support of Iranians for Ahmadinejad has become a recurring theme of his presidency. And American rhetoric is most often the cause of his rebounds. In this case, Rafsanjani said last week, “the main loser was the Americans. They are being defeated by the psychological warfare that they have started against us.” After decades of superpower interference in their affairs, Iranians are particularly prickly about their independence. Reformists say they would much rather do without the high-flown declarations of support they get from the Bush administration and its conservative allies—the talk only makes them targets. “I just want to say, ‘Shut up!’” says feminist Shadi Sadr. “How dare you sit in an office thousands of kilometers away endangering our lives here.”

Sitting under a large poster of Andy Warhol’s design for the Rolling Stones’ “Sticky Fingers” album cover, which shows the crotch of a man in tight jeans, Amir is as anti-American as Ahmadinejad’s bearded allies. “Listen, as a gay man living in Iran, I couldn’t express myself and be what I am. My brother went to jail for eight years because he opposed this regime. Two of my cousins were killed because they were communists. Despite all that, if one day America or Israel attack Iran, I’ll go back and defend my country. I’ll do that regardless of who is the president and how gay people are treated in Iran.” That’s the voice Washington should be listening to, not Ahmadinejad’s.

Source: Newsweek

Posted by Editors at 15:41:23 | Permalink | No Comments »